Czarna żona
19,792 100%
3 lata/lat temu
,jpeg/022/688/699/v2/320x180.201.jpg)
,jpeg/009/173/222/1280x720.3.jpg)
,jpeg/019/800/833/1280x720.1.jpg)
,jpeg/015/506/192/1280x720.3.jpg)
,jpeg/022/406/675/v2/320x180.201.jpg)
,jpeg/020/900/595/1280x720.6.jpg)
,jpeg/017/730/783/1280x720.1.jpg)
,jpeg/006/108/236/1280x720.9.jpg)
,jpeg/009/883/455/v2/320x180.203.jpg)
,jpeg/008/251/152/v2/320x180.210.jpg)
,jpeg/023/617/153/1280x720.c.jpg.v1690937596)
Komentarze
2
zaloguj się lub zarejestruj się, aby dodawać komentarze
mrstruggles 2 mies. temu
Who is responsible for the title of these videos? I assume it's some narrow minded white or Caucasian male BIGOT... The title of this video is "Black Wife" So does that mean when a video features a white or Caucasian female, the title of the video will commensurately be, "White Wife"? Of course it should be logical that if the title of one video featuring a solo female is "Black Wife", then a video featuring a solo white or Caucasian female should therefore be "White Wife", right? But why is it necessary anyway to specify the ethnicity of the individuals of a given video when viewers can clearly determine ethnicity (assuming that's important to them). ...point is, I don't get it. Yet I'm fallible, prone to error so, am I missing something? I welcome RELEVANT feedback.
Odpowiedz